Forum Archive. A read-only snapshot of the Warfare Incorporated forums (2003–2020), preserved for historical purposes.  ·  warfareincorporated.com
Warfare Incorporated Forum
Warfare Incorporated Forum Index » Enhancement Requests » Firing Time

Firing Time
Author Message
galm
ForeRunner


Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Posts: 2382
Location: New York
 Post Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:31 pm  Post subject: Firing Time
When units move to attack they fire after the defending units, this is what causes many attacks to fail, it might be more balance if they fired at the same time.
wonderer
Let The Truth Be Told


Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 2221
Location: birth place of, TEXAS
 Post Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 9:11 pm  
huh explain more cause your talking about moving the hole army or are you talking about sending a group to a different spot with out you controlling them :?
Cloud
Administrator


Joined: 30 Apr 2010
Posts: 427
 Post Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 10:49 pm  
What's the point of this?
sam
Die-hard Fan


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 982
Location: Far Far Away..
 Post Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:35 pm  
i think galn means

willl you know if you have a andy the defending andy always win to a attacking andy do you get me ?
Wolfy
Die-hard Fan


Joined: 29 May 2010
Posts: 590
Location: Behind u
 Post Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:40 pm  
That not true...
slimjimninja
Veteran Member


Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Posts: 1226
Location: away
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:27 am  
Um yeah it is true. An Andy attacking a different Andy will lose because the defending Andy hits first.
sam
Die-hard Fan


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 982
Location: Far Far Away..
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am  
Wolfy wrote:
That not true...


Don't say something if you don't know :roll:
Mithoz
Forum Conqueror


Joined: 09 Mar 2010
Posts: 2429
Location: Down under
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:56 am  
sam wrote:
i think galn means

willl you know if you have a andy the defending andy always win to a attacking andy do you get me ?


yea, the defending units always shoot first, but that in a sense is a thing you use to your advantage when you play
galm
ForeRunner


Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Posts: 2382
Location: New York
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 8:14 am  
slimjim and Mithoz got it, thats what i meant, and I feel like I am most reluctant in a stalemate to attack because of that fact, I am at a disadvantage to rush so for me at least it makes me want to stand still.
Wolfy
Die-hard Fan


Joined: 29 May 2010
Posts: 590
Location: Behind u
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:30 am  
Just cuz ur defending doesnt mean ull win the battle guys ;)
trineroks
Chief Administrator


Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 1770
Location: Southern Cali (UCLA)
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:33 pm  
Whenever I attack I just move my troops close to the enemy, and then send a bait to draw the enemy army in
galm
ForeRunner


Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Posts: 2382
Location: New York
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:21 pm  
Ik its just kinda inefficient, idk I just don't like it.
wonderer
Let The Truth Be Told


Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 2221
Location: birth place of, TEXAS
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:10 pm  
galm wrote:
Ik its just kinda inefficient, idk I just don't like it.


so what do you want galm both to fire at the same time? or take longer to shoot
valicious
Die-hard Fan


Joined: 03 Nov 2009
Posts: 521
Location: Pacland
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 4:14 pm  
Wolfy wrote:
Just cuz ur defending doesnt mean ull win the battle guys ;)


That would be my specialty :)
galm
ForeRunner


Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Posts: 2382
Location: New York
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:25 am  
Both to fire at the same time.
wonderer
Let The Truth Be Told


Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 2221
Location: birth place of, TEXAS
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 3:26 pm  
galm wrote:
Both to fire at the same time.


but in real life it dont work that way
galm
ForeRunner


Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Posts: 2382
Location: New York
 Post Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:32 pm  
Lol yes it does r u kidding, the defenders don't get to shoot first!
Mithoz
Forum Conqueror


Joined: 09 Mar 2010
Posts: 2429
Location: Down under
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:41 am  
galm wrote:
Lol yes it does r u kidding, the defenders don't get to shoot first!


Yea they do
Enzo007
Chatroom Moderator


Joined: 06 Jun 2010
Posts: 245
Location: Denver
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:55 pm  
Im not sure Galm. Making it so that the defending and the attacking units fire at the the same time would take away some of the strategy of the game I would think. Plus I have seen many complaints about stalemates, and evening out units/armies when they attack may lead to more of these stalemates.
galm
ForeRunner


Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Posts: 2382
Location: New York
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:43 pm  
No for me stalemates happen because no one wants to attack because they have a disadvantage.
wonderer
Let The Truth Be Told


Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 2221
Location: birth place of, TEXAS
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:46 pm  
what will happen to laser tag if this enhancement passes?
galm
ForeRunner


Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Posts: 2382
Location: New York
 Post Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:27 am  
Nothing, if you didnt command to attack you still lose.
wonderer
Let The Truth Be Told


Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 2221
Location: birth place of, TEXAS
 Post Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:07 pm  
galm wrote:
Nothing, if you didnt command to attack you still lose.


no both andys will kill each other at the same time every time
trineroks
Chief Administrator


Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 1770
Location: Southern Cali (UCLA)
 Post Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:28 pm  
wonderer wrote:
galm wrote:
Nothing, if you didnt command to attack you still lose.


no both andys will kill each other at the same time every time
You have to command Andy to attack; he won't attack by himself. This is because I set his aggression to Pacifist, meaning he will not fire unless specifically ordered to.
thebossmant
Mega-Poster


Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 442
Location: behind u
 Post Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:45 pm  
trineroks wrote:
wonderer wrote:
galm wrote:
Nothing, if you didnt command to attack you still lose.


no both andys will kill each other at the same time every time
You have to command Andy to attack; he won't attack by himself. This is because I set his aggression to Pacifist, meaning he will not fire unless specifically ordered to.


thats why trine is a boss xD

i would like to see a change in this problem
galm
ForeRunner


Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Posts: 2382
Location: New York
 Post Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 9:32 am  
Wond if they both attack it's the same
Mithoz
Forum Conqueror


Joined: 09 Mar 2010
Posts: 2429
Location: Down under
 Post Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 10:03 am  
galm wrote:
Wond if they both attack it's the same


Not really. You can position your Andy in a place so that he can shoot first always. Usually the opponent has to be just finished turning a corner
wonderer
Let The Truth Be Told


Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Posts: 2221
Location: birth place of, TEXAS
 Post Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 12:38 pm  
Mithoz wrote:
galm wrote:
Wond if they both attack it's the same


Not really. You can position your Andy in a place so that he can shoot first always. Usually the opponent has to be just finished turning a corner


thats true but galm will have them kill each other so it will mess up that map
Mithoz
Forum Conqueror


Joined: 09 Mar 2010
Posts: 2429
Location: Down under
 Post Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:08 pm  
trineroks wrote:
wonderer wrote:
galm wrote:
Nothing, if you didnt command to attack you still lose.


no both andys will kill each other at the same time every time
You have to command Andy to attack; he won't attack by himself. This is because I set his aggression to Pacifist, meaning he will not fire unless specifically ordered to.


What I think wondy is trying to say is that after everyone has explored the map, when both players see each other on the map they can make their Andy attack each other.

If they shoot at the same time no matter what, then the game will be boring. Cos what sets the good players in that map and the average ones, are the fact that thry can kill their opponent without dying
thebossmant
Mega-Poster


Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 442
Location: behind u
 Post Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 2:10 am  
i think attcker should shoot first

srry if this was alrdy said but i didnt feel like reading the whole topic
sam
Die-hard Fan


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 982
Location: Far Far Away..
 Post Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 8:28 pm  
thebossmant wrote:
i think attcker should shoot first

srry if this was alrdy said but i didnt feel like reading the whole topic



that would just be stupid in a way
galm
ForeRunner


Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Posts: 2382
Location: New York
 Post Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 8:30 pm  
People would rush more but same firing time would be the best IMO.

Back to top  ·  Warfare Incorporated Forum Index
Read-only historical archive — rebuilt from the original phpBB 2 database. Forum software © 2001-2008 phpBB Group. Posts © their respective authors. Warfare Incorporated © 2003-2026 Spiffcode, Inc.