 |
| Warfare Incorporated Forum Index » Mission Sharing » |
| Reign of Terror |
| Author | Message | |
|---|---|---|
|
dkrasnove Very Active User Joined: 25 Dec 2010 Posts: 188 Location: United States |
Description:
When a radical Yeminite terrorist group embarks on a "holy war" with the West and threatens to use stolen nuclear weapons, the world turns to the UN for guidance. As the UN Peacekeeping Force (UNPF), you must eliminate the threat of a a global nuclear disaster--or risk destruction of the free world. Author: dkrasnove Credit to trineroks for the concept of "Negotiator's Paradise" Missions: Single Player Campaign: M1: Bad Neighborhood Multiplayer Challenge: Negotiator's Paradise Players: 3 Negotiator's Paradise: Citywide Panic Players: 4 History: v1.0
Attachment:
Last edited by dkrasnove on Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:01 am; edited 25 times in total |
|
|
N@TE Chief Administrator Emeritus  Joined: 06 Dec 2009 Posts: 985 Location: Colorado |
dkrasnove, your map looks great except for one thing, which is its name. This map title is already being used by trineroks. The topic "Hostage Negotiations" has been moved to the mission pack Minipax 2!; both are by trineroks.
A change of you map title would be more acceptable than this current one. The title of this topic (Reign of Terror), appears to be available. Thanks for you cooperation. Nate |
|
|
dkrasnove Very Active User Joined: 25 Dec 2010 Posts: 188 Location: United States |
N@TE wrote: dkrasnove, your map looks great except for one thing, which is its name. This map title is already being used by trineroks. The topic "Hostage Negotiations" has been moved to the mission pack Minipax 2!; both are by trineroks. A change of you map title would be more acceptable than this current one. The title of this topic (Reign of Terror), appears to be available. Thanks for you cooperation. Nate His map was actually what inspired me to make this. Thanks for the feedback; I'll change it asap. Last edited by dkrasnove on Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
N@TE Chief Administrator Emeritus Joined: 06 Dec 2009 Posts: 985 Location: Colorado |
dkrasnove wrote: His map was actually what inspired me to make this. Thanks for the feedback; i'll change it asap. Thanks for renaming your map. Good name too! |
|
|
trineroks Chief Administrator  Joined: 16 Oct 2009 Posts: 1770 Location: Southern Cali (UCLA) |
dang this map looks great! I would suggest changing the hostages to corporate raiders, though, and allying side4 to side2 (but not the other way around). This way, cyan doesnt have any combat units to kill the terrorists guarding the cell and the raiders can't capture red's buildings (because cyan is allied to red. However, because red is not allied to cyan, he can still shoot the hostages).
|
|
|
dkrasnove Very Active User Joined: 25 Dec 2010 Posts: 188 Location: United States |
trineroks wrote: dang this map looks great! I would suggest changing the hostages to corporate raiders, though, and allying side4 to side2 (but not the other way around). This way, cyan doesnt have any combat units to kill the terrorists guarding the cell and the raiders can't capture red's buildings (because cyan is allied to red. However, because red is not allied to cyan, he can still shoot the hostages). Making the hostages Corporate Raiders is a pretty good idea. You can never trust those cheap little Andy units...  |
|
|
Amy Established Forum User Joined: 25 Jun 2010 Posts: 89 |
Not a bad map, and it's pretty good. How many other maps have you made?
|
|
|
dkrasnove Very Active User Joined: 25 Dec 2010 Posts: 188 Location: United States |
Amy wrote: Not a bad map, and it's pretty good. How many other maps have you made? I have also made Hexagons 1 Vs 1, Hexagons 2 Vs 2, and I am currently working on a rather complicated map called Domination. The objective is to capture and hold all control points for two minutes.  Lol, if it isn't a bad map, I guess it must be good, right? However, it is really annoying when I try to play this mission with other people because they don't actually read the rules  even though I invoke the formal objectives screen on mission load! |
|
|
N@TE Chief Administrator Emeritus Joined: 06 Dec 2009 Posts: 985 Location: Colorado |
dkrasnove wrote: However, it is really annoying when I try to play this mission with other people because they don't actually read the rules That is unfortunately the way that the players of WI play. Most players wave away the formal objectives like they do a 20% Battery Warning popup. Just add an alert and hope for the best. After a little while the players will learn by themselves without needing the formal objectives. Maybe they will learn from somebody who reads the formal objectives even though I invoke the formal objectives screen on mission load! . |
|
|
trineroks Chief Administrator Joined: 16 Oct 2009 Posts: 1770 Location: Southern Cali (UCLA) |
don't worry, it took a while for some of my maps to become popular (like hostage negotiations and cat and mouse). People were going on rants on how stupid my maps were and how nonsensical they were...
...and then one day some people began reading the mission objectives... |
|
|
dkrasnove Very Active User Joined: 25 Dec 2010 Posts: 188 Location: United States |
I enjoy the "nonconformist" missions just as much as I enjoy the "just blow everything up" missions. I guess when I start beating everyone on a map where they should've read the mission objective, they'll wish they had read 'em too.
 |
|
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 7:08 am Post subject: Reign of Terror
| Back to top · Warfare Incorporated Forum Index |
Read-only historical archive — rebuilt from the original phpBB 2 database.
Forum software © 2001-2008 phpBB Group. Posts © their respective authors.
Warfare Incorporated © 2003-2026 Spiffcode, Inc.